The appearance selection needs to be modified. Gorgeous, beautiful, average, 1/2 ugly, ugly are the choices. How much of a difference between gorgeous and beautiful? Slight. But beautiful to average? Big GAP! And if she's only 1/2 ugly to full ugly I'm ought of there either way.

Here's what I propose to be more accurate. Combine beautiful/gorgeous as first option. New option would be cute/pretty (see my 2 latest reviews). Then average as third. Fourth would be below average (what's only 1/2 ugly?). And fifth and finally: I'd rather be gay (to get the full effective image, not to be cruel).

To give my proposal flesh and bones here would be an example of using real women. In the beautiful /gorgeous category would be Jennifer Aniston/Angelina Jolie. Cute/pretty: Gwyneth Paltrow/Ashley Judd. Average: Claire Danes. Below average: Ellen DeGeneres. And finally last give me gay: Whoopi Goldberg.

If anyone agrees I'll suggest this to administration. Thanx for reading.

Jennifer Aniston is a dog! Can't even hold a candle to Angelina Jolie!

In deference to Doc, anyone like to make their own list based on the new rating system?

1/2 ugly but she did FS and you paid her alot of money 1/2 ugly then there is no fs and a 20.00 tip

Pretty=Beautiful. I would keep it the same but add cute between average and beautiful. 1/2 ugly and ugly stay the same. I'll take Aniston with Jolies lips. Jolie can suck a golf ball out of a garden hose .

Its all subjective and even if you had 100 options to pick, someone or everyone would disagree. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

We all know what many reviewed as beautiful 25 year olds, are actually average 38 year olds.

Beauty is subjective ie you have Jennifer Anniston as beautiful to me she is average Ellen Degerate I wouldnt have a scale that low
Maybe a 1-10 scale that would leave plenty of room for personal taste

I like the idea of a 1 to 10 system, with 5 being average. I agree with Rock that beauty is subjective, but the current rating system needs to be revised.